By Wojtek Kolan - April 13, 2025
Form
L W L W W L L W L L
Form
L W W L L W W W W LCalculated from the implied probability from the moneyline, Jacquemot has a 45.25% chance to win this match.
PLEASE NOTE: Subscribe to the Matchstat.com tennis picks club to show implied and actual predictions to discover edge in order to make successful bets.
| Prediction | Chance To Win |
|---|---|
| Elsa Jacquemot | 45.25 % |
| Elena Gabriela Ruse | 58.68 % |
|
Above is calculated from odds. Login now to reveal our expert picks. |
| Jacquemot | Stats | Ruse |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (16-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (10-5) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 144 | Ranking | 90 |
| 137 | Highest Rank | 51 |
| 21 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 7 |
| 53% (170-152) | Career Total W/L | 62% (316-194) |
| $285,203 | Career Prize Money | $1,517,404 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
14 Apr 2025 / First
Elena Gabriela Ruse implied favourite from odds → 58.68%
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the recent performance of both players, Jacquemot has won 40.94% of points on their second serve over the past six months, while Ruse trails barely behind with a 40.36% win rate on their second serve points. This closely contested stat is often a reliable predictor when assessing match outcomes between players.
When evaluating return game performance, Jacquemot leads slightly by winning 53.54% of their opponent's second serve points, in comparison to Ruse's 51.85%. For first serve returns, Jacquemot has a success rate of 28.62%, just below Ruse's 29.04%. These figures are critical in anticipating who holds the edge in head-to-head matchups.
To gauge performance under pressure, Ruse demonstrates a slight advantage, saving 49.15% of breakpoints compared to Jacquemot's 46.36%, a crucial statistic for predicting match dynamics and potential shifts in momentum during key situations.
Considering the overall performance over the last year, Ruse boasts a win rate of 67.27% (record: 37 wins to 18 losses), surpassing Jacquemot's win rate of 51.9% (record: 41 wins to 38 losses). This indicates Ruse's relatively stronger form over the year. Additionally, on their preferred surfaces, Jacquemot excels with a 58% win rate on indoor hard courts but struggles on grass with a 46% win rate. Conversely, Ruse is most successful on clay with a 64% win rate, while their least effective surface is indoor hard courts with a 57% win rate.
Examining the level of competition faced, Ruse has regularly competed against players with an average ranking of 197.62, whereas Jacquemot's opponents have held an average rank of 294.48, suggesting Ruse's experience against higher-ranked opponents might offer them an advantage.
In matches reaching a deciding set, Ruse notably outperforms Jacquemot, winning 68% of such instances compared to Jacquemot's 37%. This capacity to close out closely contested matches could be a determining factor in this face-off.
Lastly, the breakpoint conversion rate also favors Ruse, who benefits by converting 39.32% of breakpoints, over Jacquemot's 34.91%. Such impactful statistics underscore Ruse's enhanced ability to seize critical opportunities. Considering all these performance indicators and statistics, Ruse appears to enter the match as the likely favorite to secure a victory.
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
82
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
6-0 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Jesika Maleckova
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
77 of
119)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
62 of
119)
120
Total Points Won
100
|
6-0 6-7(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Veronika Erjavec
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
87%
(
41 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Cagla Buyukakcay
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tereza Valentova
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
69%
(
82 of
119)
1st Serve %
82%
(
78 of
95)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
78)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
54 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
62%
(
13 of
21)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
32
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Magdalena Frech
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Polina Kudermetova
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
57 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Ena Shibahara
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Daria Saville
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
36 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Taylor Townsend
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
110)
7
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
80)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
110)
117
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Jacquemot Vs Ruse is now available here.
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (63/65) | Win/Loss | 64% (164/94) |
| 51% (154/149) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (356/230) |
| 51% (1407/1378) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2965/2367) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 380 | Aces Total | 378 |
| 0.54 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 736 | Total Double Faults | 914 |
| 1:45:55 | Average Match Time | 1:21:17 |
| 309.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 478.41 |
| 59% (5512/9399) | 1st Serve % | 59% (8265/14121) |
| 63% (3447/5512) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5122/8265) |
| 40% (1556/3887) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2637/5856) |
| 49% (587/1203) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1065/2136) |
| 47% (4318/9222) | Return Points Win % | 50% (7324/14579) |
| 49% (63/128) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (163/253) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 28% (7/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (29/56) |
| 40% (19/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (45/73) |
| 80% (65/52) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (153/139) |
| 20% (65/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (153/14) |
| 17% (63/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (105/25) |
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
View Draw
